Subject	Define your parameters for it being "amazing."
Posted by	MixManMash on April 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM
	This message has been viewed 211 times.
In Reply To	Re: AEM vs Snow performance methanol injection kits posted by sky z on April 18, 2013 at 01:54 PM
Message	1. It still only controls based on boost. 2. It still is varying pump speed only to control delivery versus Aquamist that controls an injector and uses a constant speed pump. 3. Their "Boost-Safe" triggers something on failure, versus triggering always and turning off the trigger on failure. Their design is inherently not fail safe. What if the little trigger mechanism or the power fails to the unit. How safe is that when it won't trigger?
Follow Ups	AEM vs Snow performance methanol injection kits - KongZTT GT28RS MD 10:42:43 04/18/13 Neither. Use Aquamist instead. Why? Many reasons. - MixManMash 11:55:03 04/18/13 Well said. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 12:04:57 04/18/13 Agreed :) (n/m) - ztunerz 15:38:18 04/18/13 Yeah, if the wire falls off the failsafe, - BlackholeZ 03:10:37 04/19/13 Exactly! (n/m) - MixManMash 05:57:51 04/19/13 Re: AEM vs Snow performance methanol injection kits - sky z 13:54:26 04/18/13 Define your parameters for it being "amazing." - MixManMash 16:49:10 04/18/13 Re: Define your parameters for it being "amazing." - sky z 19:03:56 04/18/13 Seems cheaper than an engine to me. (n/m) - MixManMash 20:09:33 04/18/13 I've tracked and daily driven a Snow system for - zgene4 18:38:08 04/18/13 How many pumps have you had fail? Mine died after 2 years. - MixManMash 20:11:34 04/18/13 Killed the original shurflo pump after 2 years or so. - zgene4 20:53:37 04/18/13 AEM is what I have. - intel 21:16:46 04/18/13 Problem is the fail safe isn't fail safe. - MixManMash 01:31:40 04/19/13 We get it you love aquamist. - intel 04:09:24 04/19/13 As well, bypass pump is better, but still is no replacement - MixManMash 01:40:50 04/19/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.